ChatGPT vs Human Writing: What Worked, What Didn’t, and What I’d Choose

As a college student in the U.S., I’m always looking for tools that make school easier, especially when it comes to writing. It’s just not my thing. Essays stress me out, and I’m constantly looking for ways to get them done faster and better. 

That’s why I decided to test two popular options students are turning to: ChatGPT and EssayHub. You’ve probably heard of ChatGPT, but EssayHub is a long-standing service where real people—actual human writers—help you with your assignments. So, I ran a little experiment to find out which one writes better. 

AI vs human writing: is the hype real, or do human writers still win? Can AI actually produce work that gets a thumbs-up from your professor? Keep reading—I’ve got answers.

The Double Essay Experiment: AI vs Human

To keep things fair, I gave both ChatGPT and EssayHub the same task: a 1200-word persuasive essay on climate policy.

For ChatGPT, I typed a detailed prompt and asked it to follow a college-level structure. I expected something decent but planned to edit a bit myself. It gave me the full essay in seconds—free, fast, and easy.

With EssayHub, I submitted the same instructions, browsed a few writers and picked one with good reviews. It cost me $52.85 for a 24-hour deadline. If I had more time, for example, five days, I could’ve paid $45.67. It took a few minutes to place the order. This side-by-side test made the contrast between human writing vs AI writing clear.

Reading the Essays: My Impressions

ChatGPT gave me an essay fast. The structure was clean, but the tone? It was off. It sounded like someone was trying way too hard to sound smart.

I needed to wait for the EssayHub draft, but it was done on time. And honestly, it felt like someone who actually understood the topic wrote it. It had subtle humor and used real, specific examples that made points stick.

Meanwhile, ChatGPT just threw around big words and buzzwords like “sustainability” and “global urgency” without much depth.

In the human vs ChatGPT comparison, tone and flow made a huge difference. One paper felt alive. The other was too robotic. 

Sources, Logic, and Critical Thinking Check

This is where things really split.

When it came to depth, logic, and research, the human essay just felt smarter. In the AI creativity vs human creativity debate, it clearly wins. 

ChatGPT gave me a generic thesis, something like “climate change is bad, so we need policy.” It made points, sure, but they felt surface-level, like summaries you’d find on Wikipedia. When I asked it to fix weak sections, it didn’t really understand what I meant.

The EssayHub writer, on the other hand, took a strong stance and backed it up. There were real academic sources, solid structure, and even responses to possible counterarguments.

Plagiarism and AI Check Results

This part really mattered. I ran both essays through Turnitin and some AI-detection tools just to see what would happen.

ChatGPT’s essay got flagged with a high AI probability. Some phrases even triggered plagiarism alerts. That’s a big deal.

The human essay from EssayHub? It passed. It came back 97% original, and the writer even gave me a free plagiarism report at the end. In the AI essay vs human essay showdown, this was a serious win for the human side.

Why does it matter? Because flagged work can lead to academic penalties or worse. Trust me, you don’t want to mess around with that.

Communication: A Human Essay Writer Actually Listens

Here’s something students don’t always think about: what happens after you place the order?

With ChatGPT, it’s one-way. You type a prompt and hope it gets it right. If it doesn’t, you reword and try again. There is no real conversation, just guessing and re-prompting.

Working with a human essay writer from EssayHub was way smoother. I explained my topic, tone, and what my professor usually looks for. The writer responded quickly, asked a couple of smart questions, and actually listened. We messaged back and forth to make sure everything was on track. It felt like teamwork. Almost every EssayHub review states that communication is one of the biggest wins of the company. A human writer makes you feel heard. 

Why AI Still Can’t Replace Real Writers

Here’s the bottom line I learned from this test.

ChatGPT is fast and free, but it’s also risky. The essay felt shallow, and I didn’t even bother showing it to my professor. Honestly, they would’ve spotted it as AI in seconds, either just by reading or using a detection tool.

Real writers, like the one I worked with, bring something AI can’t: experience, clarity, and human logic. In the ChatGPT vs human writer test, people won big. Writing isn’t just throwing words together. It’s about tone, intent, and really getting the assignment.

If your GPA matters, and let’s be real, it does—it’s not worth gambling on AI. The money you spend on a real writing service? 100% worth it for peace of mind.

My Final Verdict: What I’d Choose Next Time

I’m glad I tried both ChatGPT and human writing help. It helped me figure out what works and what doesn’t. Now, I know where to go when I’m stuck or running out of time. The human help I got from EssayHub felt personal, reliable, and totally worth the price.

In the whole AI vs human intelligence debate, this experience made one thing clear: smart writing still needs a human brain behind it.

Would I rely on ChatGPT for an important essay again? No. Not unless I want to stress over edits and AI detection. AI might be the future, but it’s not writing my essays anytime soon.